Friday Slide: What Roger Ebert Meant To Me

Yesterday, my favorite movie reviewer passed away after a long struggle with cancer. Roger Ebert was 70, and he had spent his entire professional life reviewing movies in print, television, and eventually online. Even though he didn’t consider video games to be on the same artistic level as films, he was still my biggest influence when it comes to writing reviews.

Watching Ebert’s weekend review show with co-host Richard Roeper was, to me, like Neo from The Matrix downloading a kung-fu skills pack to his brain. In the space of half an hour, the two critics would cover a half-dozen or more full-length movies, condensing their storylines, notable performances, and technical achievements into clear and concise reviews.

Without paying a dime or spending hours at the theater, I’d be left with a full rundown of all that was new in the world of movies that week. I could even form some basis of my own opinion based on the critics’ opinions, without having seen the full movies myself. Like other journalists, they used their first-hand experiences to share stories, and offered access to physical and intellectual places I couldn’t reach on my own.

Ebert and his colleagues demonstrated that reviews can be entertaining in their own right, and that watching a critic respond to a movie can be like watching yourself in a mirror. You can respond to the same stimulii– a particularly brain-dead plot hole, for example, or a moving emotional climax– by watching someone else go through it first.

eberthumbsup

Ebert taught me that reviews can deepen our appreciation of their subjects– an entertaining review of a bad movie can be a lot of fun to read, while an insightful review can lead you to discover new details you might have missed otherwise. He also demonstrated the power of reviews. Reviewers constantly pass judgment on someone else’s creative endeavor, after that creator has spent months or years developing it. Roger was careful not to use this power to maliciously tear down others’ creative efforts, but rather, to try to shape the industry into something more meaningful.

Even though he was a master of the movie review, Roger Ebert never seemed to grasp this generation’s primary entertainment experiences, video games. Like movies, video games are made as both a labor of love and a financial investment. They can be enjoyed individually, with friends and family, or with a larger community. But unlike movies, games require a player of some skill to really shine. Ebert never struck me as a skilled gamer, which is why he failed to see the artistic value of games like Bioshock or Shadow of the Colossus.

At Slide To Play, we try to apply Ebert’s legacy of concise, entertaining, and insightful reviews to the highly diverse App Store. Mobile games aren’t usually as long as films, but they do have the potential to suck up more time, or deliver visceral or social experiences that even the best movies rarely touch. Beating a game’s tough boss fight with just a sliver of health left can be more exciting than watching a hero win in a movie’s final act, because it’s you at the controls, and you who determines the ultimate outcome. As critics, we often get to play first, and then give our readers a chance to see the game through our eyes.

Roger Ebert wrote tens of thousands of reviews for the Chicago Sun-Times, and on Slide To Play, we’ve published thousands of game reviews. Each of those articles is our opportunity to virtually transport you into our point of view, so you can perceive a ghost of the memory (good or bad) that our reviewer experienced.

This is more than just a Consumer Reports-style stamp of approval, telling you to buy this or skip that. It’s about seeking deeper meaning, and trying to understand the hidden psychology of the games we play, why we respond to them, and how creative people are using this brand-new medium to express themselves. Ebert understood this about movies, and he was starting to come around on video games. Our job is to pick up his precedent, apply it to the world of mobile gaming, and see how far it takes us.

9 thoughts on “Friday Slide: What Roger Ebert Meant To Me

  1. Ebert was right, video games are entertainment dressed up with art. The best video game does not come close to having the same emotional impact as a good film. The stories told in video games are amateurish at best, and usually are nothing more then silly fantasies. A good film puts you in the hands of a master story teller & illuminates the human condition, video games are often much better without a story. This is not to trash gaming, I do enjoy them and this site, but when I finish a good book, movie, or music album there’s an emotional gain/reward. When I finish a good video game, I often feel the same way that I do after finishing a good piece of cake. Guilt for wasting my time with so many empty calories.

      • Take away the awesome gameplay, and put that story into a movie or novel, and it’s not that good. In a game, the story is supported by the actual gameplay. Without the gameplay the story cannot stand on it’s own. It’s simply not written to stand on its own.

        • I disagree ever heard the walking dead video game? And max payne? The vido game is even better than the movie itself. Video games brings just as much emotion as movies.

          • Yeah, I have that one too. Good game, we have to agree to disagree about the story’s value. I think it pales in comparison to the TV show & comic.

          • I was referring to The Walking Dead in my last post. Max Payne just plain sucks, story wise.

        • Games are never just about the stories… otherwise, they’d be movies or TV. For me, the impact is heightened by having some control over the outcome– whether you live or die is determined by your actions or skill. Also, it determines the pace that you advance the storyline. More than watching a movie, I find that playing as the hero makes me feel more invested in a game’s story.

    • Plus, you probably only play iPhone games. Console games have awesome stories, even better than that of movies. And trust me, I see a lot of movies. So don’t say things you don’t know.

      • No, I don’t only play IPhone games, though they don’t take up as much of your time as console games, so that’s a plus. Listen, I’m not saying every movie is art, but the best games don’t come close to the best movies. Games are pure entertainment, there’s nothing wrong with that. There’s a reason video game based movies never work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>